Moderators: 'junior' and 'senior' or just 'moderator'?

[Subtle]

Haven't misunderstood. Im all for giving people recognition for their work and efforts, but it will create its own issues. It's like how some people believe that veterans think they are better than everyone else just because they've played longer.

It's irrelevant to their duties. I don't think they need a rank. You guys need unity. But also need to keep in mind that some things are for the better because they do need to be defined, for the sake of people. It's like saying you're going to merge admins with rapsey and mikes rank.... you need people who are able to do certain things. Labelling it under pvp and helper causes the conflict.. but keeping it as the junior/senior, instead of the merge, would just prove and show where their experience is on the ladder.

I know.Im not explaining myself well, I am currently limited for time, so I apologise.

[Fierce]

Haven't misunderstood. Im all for giving people recognition for their work and efforts, but it will create its own issues. It's like how some people believe that veterans think they are better than everyone else just because they've played longer.

It's irrelevant to their duties. I don't think they need a rank. You guys need unity. But also need to keep in mind that some things are for the better because they do need to be defined, for the sake of people. It's like saying you're going to merge admins with rapsey and mikes rank.... you need people who are able to do certain things. Labelling it under pvp and helper causes the conflict.. but keeping it as the junior/senior, instead of the merge, would just prove and show where their experience is on the ladder.

I know.Im not explaining myself well, I am currently limited for time, so I apologise.

I disagree. If you want an explanation why? Feel free to ask. Personally, I think it's self explanatory as to why I disagree.