What should the cost of a room be?

[Rick]

I know this is offtopic, Mike. But is there a possibilty to add butlers instead of bankers, to minimize the botting in player owned houses?

Sorry if i'm being a hassle, tho.

Agreed.

People will just camp in houses.

I voted for 100-300m but i mean 1-30m -.-

[Dragon40226]

I think that it should cost 10-300m because if you have 1-30m all of the houses will be HUGE which isnt what i feel construction should be about, having a big house should be an achievement. An achievement shouldnt cost 3b for a 100 rooms, should cost 30b+.

[Pleaseno1]

I think that it should cost 10-300m because if you have 1-30m all of the houses will be HUGE which isnt what i feel construction should be about, having a big house should be an achievement. An achievement shouldnt cost 3b for a 100 rooms, should cost 30b+.

The furniture will also cost.

[Serving]

I voted 10-300m for the same reason as Carols.

Theres no skill that we can waste our money on it without getting some of it back
We want to waste some + take some cash out of eco.

[Rawr]

250 rooms @ 300M each...

That's possibly spending 75B, just on GETTING the rooms you want, let alone actually putting what you want in them...I seriously think that's too high a cost.

[Azu rite]

2.250m min for 250 rooms 9.5b max assuming the house for 250 rooms costs 2b with no furniture. By the time you decorate the house on the 1-30m option you would have spent over 10-20b...that is more than enough.

[Blahblahdie]

I voted for the 10m-300m. Want to know why? Construction should take people a while to finish completely. If everyone knocks out 250 rooms right off the bat, then what.. everyone will complain that they're bored and done with the skill. So, if you have the prices that high, it will only encourage and raise the potential market for skillers to continue to make and sell supplies, keep people busy for months, and all in all help remove money out the eco. Boom.

[Rawr]

I voted for the 10m-300m. Want to know why? Construction should take people a while to finish completely. If everyone knocks out 250 rooms right off the bat, then what.. everyone will complain that they're bored and done with the skill. So, if you have the prices that high, it will only encourage and raise the potential market for skillers to continue to make and sell supplies, keep people busy for months, and all in all help remove money out the eco. Boom.

I'm happy to spend 7.5B on rooms, but not 75B. I'd rather stick to a shit house and just get 99, then waste 75B on just getting rooms, let alone decorating them. Even 30B for 100 rooms would mean that the number of people having a reasonable sized room is limited to few.

[Blahblahdie]

I voted for the 10m-300m. Want to know why? Construction should take people a while to finish completely. If everyone knocks out 250 rooms right off the bat, then what.. everyone will complain that they're bored and done with the skill. So, if you have the prices that high, it will only encourage and raise the potential market for skillers to continue to make and sell supplies, keep people busy for months, and all in all help remove money out the eco. Boom.

I'm happy to spend 7.5B on rooms, but not 75B. I'd rather stick to a shit house and just get 99, then waste 75B on just getting rooms, let alone decorating them. Even 30B for 100 rooms would mean that the number of people having a reasonable sized room is limited to few.

It only means that I'll have the best block parties because my house will be one of the only mansions . Love you Danny xD

[Hunter2943]

it depends on the room, a dungeon would most likely cost a lot more than like a dining room ect, i thin a dungeon would be fair at abotu 250m while a dining room at like 30m, keep workin hard mike! we appreciate it!