Should regular players be able to complete 2x PvM tasks?

[Slap a ho]

Fat kids cannot skip physical education simply because they don't want to do running.

Best comment goes to you. PM me to collect your winnings.

[A iron girl]

I would like it if ironmen could choose the option to do the pking requirements over 2x pvm requirements.

[James]

I would like it if ironmen could choose the option to do the pking requirements over 2x pvm requirements.

Seems reasonable enough

[Gethigh udie]

Keep the 500 kill requirement as is. So players can pk in the gear & location of their choice, and not have to worry about getting x amount of dmg with this or that or here and there, and so on. Then make the diary just wildy pvm & skilling challenges. Still gets players into the wild, and lets them do it there way.

OT: They should have to complete it, without a alternative. Many other none or bad pkers in the past have done the current 500 kill req without a alternative. Those that couldn't simply wouldn't get comp, or would have to get it serviced.

[Mike]

Thanks for all the feedback - interestingly, almost everyone who posts is against the idea of skipping the PvP part, while almost half the players who vote are in favour.

Looks like the "No" side has somewhat more votes and is more vocal about it, meaning so far the option will not be added. However, we'll leave the topic online until the diary is released, you never know.

[King four]

Keep the 500 kill requirement as is. So players can pk in the gear & location of their choice, and not have to worry about getting x amount of dmg with this or that or here and there, and so on. Then make the diary just wildy pvm & skilling challenges. Still gets players into the wild, and lets them do it there way.

OT: They should have to complete it, without a alternative. Many other none or bad pkers in the past have done the current 500 kill req without a alternative. Those that couldn't simply wouldn't get comp, or would have to get it serviced.

i agree with this, if they dont want to put in the time, they simple dont get the comp cape or have someone service it for them, requirements for comp shouldnt be able to give a easier option for someone, and should be good and all aspects of the game

[Ruler]

Keep the 500 kill requirement as is. So players can pk in the gear & location of their choice, and not have to worry about getting x amount of dmg with this or that or here and there, and so on. Then make the diary just wildy pvm & skilling challenges. Still gets players into the wild, and lets them do it there way.

OT: They should have to complete it, without a alternative. Many other none or bad pkers in the past have done the current 500 kill req without a alternative. Those that couldn't simply wouldn't get comp, or would have to get it serviced.

The idea of the pvp diaries is that 500 kills is way too easy to boost.

[Jousi]

Thanks for all the feedback - interestingly, almost everyone who posts is against the idea of skipping the PvP part, while almost half the players who vote are in favour.

Looks like the "No" side has somewhat more votes and is more vocal about it, meaning so far the option will not be added. However, we'll leave the topic online until the diary is released, you never know.

Frankly, the 'Yes' voters are trying to rig the poll because they have nothing else to offer but "I don't want to PK".

[Leetyears]

I had a post here before someone deleted where i simply gave my opinion for x2 pvm. Please give this options to the player as increasing the wilderness pvm requirement will still bring activity to the wild. the vote shows more support for it than against but it seems if you write a post for the x2 pvm option it gets deleted.

[Slap a ho]

I had a post here before someone deleted where i simply gave my opinion for x2 pvm. Please give this options to the player as increasing the wilderness pvm requirement will still bring activity to the wild. the vote shows more support for it than against but it seems if you write a post for the x2 pvm option it gets deleted.

You commenting on posts that are 5 months old and have already been implemented/decided upon is why your post got deleted. You’re just spamming the forums at this point.