people paid tons of money to use death, it shoudl be used here aswell as it was meant for pvmPoem wrote:Let's make it to where you can't use Cannon or Morphs there, then people can't camp them, and people can't annoy the shit out of everyone with cannons.
Time for some glacors
- Metal raimon
- Premium Donator
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2014 1:10 pm
Re: Time for some glacors
Check out my channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCY8TYj ... xJAb9sZKnQ
-
- Wise One
- Posts: 901
- Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 10:49 pm
Re: Time for some glacors
For those who are crying about the suggestion of morphs not being allowed in there, stop being pathetic.
You have so many places to PVM, using the most POWERFUL setup. Having one NEW spot where you cannot enter in a morph isn't a stupid idea, if anything, it's actually a fair outcome for all.
Just because you payed for Death doesn't mean that everything about this servers NPCs should benefit and cater to you.
If anything, it SHOULD cater to the masses, not just the minimal amount of morph ring holders.
Think about it, you already have free roam of pvming as it is, and the purpose of new material bbeing added is to bring in new player, meanwhile keeping the old ones.
You have so many places to PVM, using the most POWERFUL setup. Having one NEW spot where you cannot enter in a morph isn't a stupid idea, if anything, it's actually a fair outcome for all.
Just because you payed for Death doesn't mean that everything about this servers NPCs should benefit and cater to you.
If anything, it SHOULD cater to the masses, not just the minimal amount of morph ring holders.
Think about it, you already have free roam of pvming as it is, and the purpose of new material bbeing added is to bring in new player, meanwhile keeping the old ones.
F3arme wrote:also I have some great impressions I can use at a party to avoid awkward pauses
- James
- Premium Donator
- Posts: 4613
- Joined: Mon Dec 30, 2013 1:56 pm
Re: Time for some glacors
Majority of people that use the forums are donator+.
The first option isn't accurately measured if the whole community isn't voting.
The first option isn't accurately measured if the whole community isn't voting.
- Kalista
- Honor Player
- Posts: 6548
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2013 11:53 pm
- Location: Fishers, Indiana
Re: Time for some glacors
Having morphs being allowed wouldn't affect people without morphs, they pvm on morph height anyways. There's really no sound reason why they shouldn't be allowed there.Torey lanez wrote:For those who are crying about the suggestion of morphs not being allowed in there, stop being pathetic.
You have so many places to PVM, using the most POWERFUL setup. Having one NEW spot where you cannot enter in a morph isn't a stupid idea, if anything, it's actually a fair outcome for all.
Just because you payed for Death doesn't mean that everything about this servers NPCs should benefit and cater to you.
If anything, it SHOULD cater to the masses, not just the minimal amount of morph ring holders.
Think about it, you already have free roam of pvming as it is, and the purpose of new material bbeing added is to bring in new player, meanwhile keeping the old ones.
Doesn't effect me either way, it's just my opinion
- Ruler
- Honor Player
- Posts: 7541
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2013 6:13 pm
- Location: The Netherlands
Re: Time for some glacors
Depends where the glacors are going to be located. If the cave will be in the wildy, making it able for deaths to pvm there would be really unfair because it defeats the purpose of having the cave in the wildy. Deaths could go to the cave without a risk of getting pked.Rikka wrote:Having morphs being allowed wouldn't affect people without morphs, they pvm on morph height anyways. There's really no sound reason why they shouldn't be allowed there.Torey lanez wrote:For those who are crying about the suggestion of morphs not being allowed in there, stop being pathetic.
You have so many places to PVM, using the most POWERFUL setup. Having one NEW spot where you cannot enter in a morph isn't a stupid idea, if anything, it's actually a fair outcome for all.
Just because you payed for Death doesn't mean that everything about this servers NPCs should benefit and cater to you.
If anything, it SHOULD cater to the masses, not just the minimal amount of morph ring holders.
Think about it, you already have free roam of pvming as it is, and the purpose of new material bbeing added is to bring in new player, meanwhile keeping the old ones.
Doesn't effect me either way, it's just my opinion
- Swaggit
- Honor Player
- Posts: 3338
- Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: Time for some glacors
I actually disagree, if anything keep it on two heights to be honest but for the love of god don't remove morphs in that area.Torey lanez wrote:For those who are crying about the suggestion of morphs not being allowed in there, stop being pathetic.
You have so many places to PVM, using the most POWERFUL setup. Having one NEW spot where you cannot enter in a morph isn't a stupid idea, if anything, it's actually a fair outcome for all.
Just because you payed for Death doesn't mean that everything about this servers NPCs should benefit and cater to you.
If anything, it SHOULD cater to the masses, not just the minimal amount of morph ring holders.
Think about it, you already have free roam of pvming as it is, and the purpose of new material bbeing added is to bring in new player, meanwhile keeping the old ones.
Think about it, if you worked so hard to get something either from paying for the magic stone or elite hunting, and then obtaining the fifty thousand slayer points just so that you can be at a disadvantage because you can't use Death in new content? Like honestly, I know of people who sell their banks just so that they can get death and they never really buy armor again and now people are suggesting to remove morphs from some new content? I know it's a small part of the server but they're still a part of our community. It's an elitist thing, yes, but it still matters. A fair amount of players have a morph ring and I think they should always be considered when it comes to new content but we shouldn't exclude them from new content wholly. I like the idea of compromise, not necessarily the idea of just removing them from the update wholly. And yes, I know that they can always just come back with armor but honestly, people can outhit death all the time with Completionist Capes, Chaos Whips, Void bonuses, etc etc. It's not hard to do so, it's all RNG anyways so theirs always a fair shot of outhitting a death. And anyways, if their's morph world, why are we complaining about this?
-
- Premium Donator
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2014 2:22 pm
Re: Time for some glacors
dont make it donor only it will make the richer only richer that why the eco sucks
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2015 6:33 pm
Re: Time for some glacors
Glacors need to be located within the wild. It would be a step in the right direction to save the wildy and bring it back. Without valuable drop monsters like glacors and more like it, ppl will never have any incentive to go into the wild. PUT THEM DEEP! #SaveTheWildy
- Azu rite
- Premium Donator
- Posts: 17605
- Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2013 1:42 am
- Location: Over there in that one place
Re: Time for some glacors
If you're placing them in the wildy, disable all transformation items from entering the wilderness, they have no place there anyway.
-
- Premium Donator
- Posts: 1046
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2013 11:23 pm
- Location: Shropshire, UK
Re: Time for some glacors
What is the problem of being able to use transformations in the wilderness?Azu rite wrote:If you're placing them in the wildy, disable all transformation items from entering the wilderness, they have no place there anyway.