PkHonor

Brandt wrote:

Wir3d wrote:

Grizzly mint wrote: jacob4newheadhelper

Already supported, but.. +2

How's the revamp coming along? @Billy and Rapsey

Amount wrote:While some of us take issue with the premise of these changes, let us unite in the realisation that, in every darkness, there is a light.

It may have taken the removal of the entire rank... but Bzink00 is a Helper no more. By golly, that was long overdue.

Amount wrote:While some of us take issue with the premise of these changes, let us unite in the realisation that, in every darkness, there is a light.

It may have taken the (temporary) removal of the entire rank... but Bzink00 is a Helper no more. By golly, that was long overdue.

Billy wrote:

Amount wrote:While some of us take issue with the premise of these changes, let us unite in the realisation that, in every darkness, there is a light.

It may have taken the removal of the entire rank... but Bzink00 is a Helper no more. By golly, that was long overdue.

If we were to be objective and had an activity requirement for helpers, then there should have been more demotions then just Bzink.

Sverre wrote:Brad doesn't mean brant should have been demoted just for activity.

Ain wrote:

Billy wrote:

Amount wrote:While some of us take issue with the premise of these changes, let us unite in the realisation that, in every darkness, there is a light.

It may have taken the removal of the entire rank... but Bzink00 is a Helper no more. By golly, that was long overdue.

If we were to be objective and had an activity requirement for helpers, then there should have been more demotions then just Bzink.

Uhm no. There wouldn't have been. All the other helpers were grade-A and I saw them on wayyyy more then any of the moderators (except p000p)