PkHonor

Azu rite wrote:Add pkp please

+1

Oooo love it. Keep up the good work mate.

Awesome! Thanks rapsey!

Nice, thanks to all who were involved in bringing out the update.

Optimally, equal top rankers should be sorted by time achieved, rather than alphabetically.
I doubt this is possible though, as I can't see why the highscores as they stand now would incorporate timestamps.

Amount wrote:Nice, thanks to all who were involved in bringing out the update.

Optimally, equal top rankers should be sorted by time achieved, rather than alphabetically.
I doubt this is possible though, as I can't see why the highscores as they stand now would incorporate timestamps.

Would be pretty awesome.
As Brad said though, not sure if its even possible.

Amount wrote:Nice, thanks to all who were involved in bringing out the update.

Optimally, equal top rankers should be sorted by time achieved, rather than alphabetically.
I doubt this is possible though, as I can't see why the highscores as they stand now would incorporate timestamps.

What would happen is, as they are placed in the rankings, they just go under the lowest person in said ranking.
Not sure how that would work as far as setting it up, but that's how they work when it's set up right.

Rapsey wrote:

Rick wrote:Also can you make it so whenever you're on an user their page "click someones name" on the left side you have all categories, can you make those clickable aswell? Bit more easy then, instead of the dropdown menu everytime :p

Done.

Much love

Thats some awesome shit you made there. Nice!
Only thing that is missing is pkp

Nickrock234 wrote:

Amount wrote:Nice, thanks to all who were involved in bringing out the update.

Optimally, equal top rankers should be sorted by time achieved, rather than alphabetically.
I doubt this is possible though, as I can't see why the highscores as they stand now would incorporate timestamps.

What would happen is, as they are placed in the rankings, they just go under the lowest person in said ranking.
Not sure how that would work as far as setting it up, but that's how they work when it's set up right.

Yes, I do believe I understand how it would work, given that I suggested it.

Amount wrote:

Nickrock234 wrote:

Amount wrote:Nice, thanks to all who were involved in bringing out the update.

Optimally, equal top rankers should be sorted by time achieved, rather than alphabetically.
I doubt this is possible though, as I can't see why the highscores as they stand now would incorporate timestamps.

What would happen is, as they are placed in the rankings, they just go under the lowest person in said ranking.
Not sure how that would work as far as setting it up, but that's how they work when it's set up right.

Yes, I do believe I understand how it would work, given that I suggested it.

just clarifying I suppose.