Re: scammers and loop holes
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2021 8:57 pm
This is what I mean by using words to loop hole a system, sure lets say it's unofficial, but most players that are scammed most likely don't even know there's an official way of doing these deals that would protect them, let alone post a PMD before every stake every single time.Rapsey wrote: ↑Wed Oct 06, 2021 5:05 pm* as long as it's an unofficial and unprotected player-made dealThearlygamer wrote: ↑Wed Oct 06, 2021 2:53 am while also giving scammers the hint that as long as it’s a player made deal and can get away with it then scam all you want for financial gain.
Again NOBODY expects someone to use the webster dictionary definition to define what a scammer is on OSRS, PkHonor, or any RSPS at that. What 99.99% of players consider a scammer is someone being scummy snake who does wrong to another, if you think I'm the only one who thinks that I wouldn't mind asking around and getting some responses from anyone else.Rapsey wrote: ↑Wed Oct 06, 2021 5:05 pm It's also worth noting that your definition of a scammer is much broader than its common meaning. Normally a scam only refers to forms of organised fraud, and you can bet that if someone was going around systematically trying to con players we would try to put a stop to it. What you call a scammer is anyone who doesn't keep their word. By that definition we are all scammers, because I'm sure we have all failed to keep our word at one point or another (and would have found it eerily totalitarian if the police showed up at our door to intercede).
You're making it sound exaggerated to say the least.. even a game like Poker has rules and if you catch someone peeking at your hand damn right you're going to be mad, call them out, and have them punished. You assume it's a casual game with a "friend" when in fact its a scumbag trying to cheat you while the same scumbag is the referee of the game. Not to mention a lot of players don't just play this game casually, some spend a lot and I mean A LOT of time and IRL money to enjoy this game, so I think it should be taken very seriously when someone is scammed any amount. Just for reference the 150b if there wasn't public out cry and if it wasn't returned would be equivalant to 50 hours of their time at some of the best money making areas to recoup that, and all to a mod being a snake.
Yes, yes I do, because staff should be there to help and protect players when it's obvious its a scam (again with proper proof like I've mentioned before) and they can use whatever logs possible to back it up, if it doesn't back up then we move on with it, but when there is all this in front of us again we see another scammer go free along with any winnings they made from it (thinking of the Taylor Gang situation specifically on this one).Rapsey wrote: ↑Wed Oct 06, 2021 5:05 pm Seriously WTF. Aside from serious formal agreements (i.e. the system we already have), do you really think it's appropriate to insist on authoritarian interdiction in every situation to ensure everyone acts like angels all the time? We don't even do that in real life, why on earth would we do that in a game...
You know better than me the % of our players who use the forums let alone bother enough to make an account and post, again no one is going to post every agreement before hand. It's lazy, but it's true I only ask that when it's a blatant scam that staff do something about it other than throw their hands in the air and say even though we have ALL the evidence we can't do anything about it.Rapsey wrote: ↑Wed Oct 06, 2021 5:05 pm I'm perfectly willing to accept video evidence for fights instead of having a staff referee, but the deal still needs to be posted beforehand. This is not only a matter of evidence (because again, you can choose which parts of the agreement you include in your video as it suits your interests), but also in large part because both players need to be aware of and acknowledge that they are engaging in a legally binding agreement. The idea that every word you say automatically constitutes a legal contract and staff will police all your interactions to ensure you are nothing but truthful is something I find absolutely dystopian.
[/quote]Rapsey wrote: ↑Wed Oct 06, 2021 5:05 pmThat might be a necessary (or rather justifiable) evil.Thearlygamer wrote: ↑Wed Oct 06, 2021 2:53 am I think it’s focused more on then finding a way to avoid being scammed and less on the real issue we’ve brought up that once they’ve been scammed, regardless of how it happened, the person who scammed isn’t only not punished, they’re left with the money or items they scammed and get to keep enjoying their days on the server with no serious repercussions and I think that’s what will drive the drama train and we’ll have another multi page thread on how a scammer scammed without being punished
As I see it the comparison is something like this (based on my observations):
tl;dr: the reduction in scamming that results from people engaging in official agreements outweighs the increase in scamming that occurs in the leftover unprotected deals.
In no way whatsoever would I ever agree its necessary nor justifiable to allow a scammer scumbag to do these things and run free with the money and no punishment I don't care what system is in place, this is an issue people have everywhere and this is exactly why people lose faith in the game they play because they know if someone scams them it's possible they receive no punishment and their items are kept by the scammer. I'm not saying the system will ever be 100% perfect and some people might slip through, but you shouldn't allow people to walk free when you have all the evidence just because a system is telling you you can't do anything when youre the ones who created the system. I agree with Patel for cases like these that there should be some plyability when it's so blatantly obvious what happened and now you have a large group of players not only mad at the scammer but also untrustful of the staff team who decided to not speak up and the system that allowed this to go unpunished.
To be fair the discussion is only at hand because of the recent out cry. If there was no wrong doing the money should not have been refunded, but we all know it was wrong, and it was so obviously wrong that Arrsenic tried to cover it up in those pms directly to the player by using loop holes to argue his way, look at my freaking signature and the signature of many others for crying out loud. This is not a small 'oops a good staff member dropped the ball' this is a staff member not only messing up with being dishonest, not only trying to loop hole out of it, but also someone who has a history of this and in opportunity showed his true colors.Rapsey wrote: ↑Wed Oct 06, 2021 5:05 pmThis uproar has nothing to do with the question of "only official deals" vs "try to protect all deals". It's simply a matter of what is illegal under our rules. This was an official deal and that is ultimately what protected it (the money was refunded, remember). If we tried to protect all player-made deals the result would've been the same. The current outcry that it should be illegal and punishable, even though it wasn't illegal, is entirely unrelated to the discussion at hand.
The whole "it isn't illegal at the time so it goes unpunished" is as much an argument a player will make when they say "well it's not a bug until it's reported so until then it's a feature" while it's a game breaking thing they do.
On this note I personally think I can see where you stand on this whole discussion. If this mindset was kept there would never be progress and people would continue to be angry with the system. It was laws that allowed for some of the most vile things happen in human history, that doesn't mean it's okay or right nor does it mean it shouldn't go unpunished just because there wasn't a law by the time people found out these injustices were happening.Rapsey wrote: ↑Wed Oct 06, 2021 5:05 pm Nonsense. Rules are rules. You want us to punish someone who didn't break any rules because you don't like what he did. That isn't us selectively enforcing the rules, that's you trying to enforce rules that don't exist. That is justice of the mob, which isn't justice at all.