Page 3 of 6

Re: Glacor location

Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2015 4:41 pm
by Simon
Rikka wrote:
Rawr wrote:Of course everyone is voting for the cave option...just because the community want something to become risk free and safe, doesn't make it a great option. People are choosing what's best for them, completely ignoring what might be best for the game.
Or, instead of making glacors in the wild, where they shouldn't even be, make a different monster that is actually supposed to be in the wild, in the wild.
And what monster would that be?

Re: Glacor location

Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2015 4:48 pm
by Kalista
Simon wrote:
Rikka wrote:
Rawr wrote:Of course everyone is voting for the cave option...just because the community want something to become risk free and safe, doesn't make it a great option. People are choosing what's best for them, completely ignoring what might be best for the game.
Or, instead of making glacors in the wild, where they shouldn't even be, make a different monster that is actually supposed to be in the wild, in the wild.
And what monster would that be?
Maybe add some of the monsters from the oldschool wild like the Crazed Archaeologist, Chaos Fanatic, Scorpia, Vet'ion, Venenatis, and Callisto

If needed alter their drop tables to better suit a private server.

Re: Glacor location

Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2015 4:58 pm
by Cadwalada
And what monster would that be?[/quote]

Maybe add some of the monsters from the oldschool wild like the Crazed Archaeologist, Chaos Fanatic, Scorpia, Vet'ion, Venenatis, and Callisto

If needed alter their drop tables to better suit a private server.[/quote]

I would also like to see this, although the I'm not sure about the rings as the p ring has just been released, so maybe another item that would be equally as good maybe some gloves or something, although the shields could be pretty cool.

Re: Glacor location

Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2015 8:52 pm
by Ain
Simon wrote:
Rikka wrote:
Rawr wrote:Of course everyone is voting for the cave option...just because the community want something to become risk free and safe, doesn't make it a great option. People are choosing what's best for them, completely ignoring what might be best for the game.
Or, instead of making glacors in the wild, where they shouldn't even be, make a different monster that is actually supposed to be in the wild, in the wild.
And what monster would that be?
Perhaps revenants?

Glacors in the wilderness are not going to help the wilderness community, this has already been proven from glacors being in the wilderness now for a while.

Re: Glacor location

Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 12:11 am
by K1l1l1l1l1l1
Make 5 or 6 entrances if you need to, otherwise clans will just camp the entrance and it'll be impossible to fight them.

Re: Glacor location

Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 12:15 am
by Ruler
Noobinho wrote:Make 5 or 6 entrances if you need to, otherwise clans will just camp the entrance and it'll be impossible to fight them.
That would totally take away the purpose of placing them in wildy....

Re: Glacor location

Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 12:33 am
by Kingz
These things don't even drop the boots often enough for them to make it seem worthy to go to wild, but hey multi combat sounds good for me. I know they are supposed to be a harder monster
but boots shouldn't be worth 3-5b each..any ideas on making the loots a little easier to get?

Re: Glacor location

Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 3:11 pm
by Nick
Kingz wrote:These things don't even drop the boots often enough for them to make it seem worthy to go to wild, but hey multi combat sounds good for me. I know they are supposed to be a harder monster
but boots shouldn't be worth 3-5b each..any ideas on making the loots a little easier to get?
4 boots in 30 kills say otherwise.
Smdjagex wrote:IF they get moved to a cave ban death from killing them. If not you as well just spawn 2.147m boots and drop them
This ^

They have literally no risk of getting pk'd.
Rawr wrote:Of course everyone is voting for the cave option...just because the community want something to become risk free and safe, doesn't make it a great option. People are choosing what's best for them, completely ignoring what might be best for the game.
Tru dat...

Anyways, I prefer them to stay single-combat, but maybe somewhere else where its not easily accessible... I initially thought they would be placed on the other side of the deep wilderness gate...

Re: Glacor location

Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 4:13 pm
by Ain
Sverre wrote:
Noobinho wrote:Make 5 or 6 entrances if you need to, otherwise clans will just camp the entrance and it'll be impossible to fight them.
That would totally take away the purpose of placing them in wildy....
DING DING!

You sir just showed why they shouldn't be in the wildy.

Re: Glacor location

Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 4:14 pm
by Simon
Ain wrote:
Sverre wrote:
Noobinho wrote:Make 5 or 6 entrances if you need to, otherwise clans will just camp the entrance and it'll be impossible to fight them.
That would totally take away the purpose of placing them in wildy....
DING DING!

You sir just showed why they shouldn't be in the wildy.
?